

BEAM P
LUS
I
NTERIORS
C
OMMERCIAL
, R
ETAIL
A
ND
I
NSTITUTIONAL
F
RAMEWORK
Copyright © BEAM Society Limited. All rights reserved. Page 23
air, land and water.
Performance Benchmarks
BEAM Plus uses local performance standards, codes and guides where
these are available. Where these are not available, international or
national standards, codes and guides are referenced. Where there are
differences in the performance criteria set by the various authorities
BEAM Plus will avoid specifying the performance criteria, allowing the
Applicant to specify what they consider to be appropriate for their
premises.
The BEAM rating process seeks confirmation that the performance
levels have been achieved. Where performance standards are not well
defined BEAM establishes its own performance benchmarks based on
available data and stakeholder consensus. More points are awarded for
higher levels of performance achieved.
Raising Building Performance Standards
Responding to environmental priorities and to social and economic
issues, BEAM strives to improve the overall performance of buildings.
BEAM encourages progressively higher standards of performance and
innovations that contribute to such performance.
Absolute versus Relative Performance
Through opinion surveys of BEAM Society members it is apparent that
there should be a balance between assessment of performance issues
over which the Applicant may have little or no control and performance
issues that can be influenced by the Applicant.
In addition, BEAM’s position is that assessment of some aspects of
performance should not be penalised because of externalities that are
not under the control of the Applicant. For example, the efficiency of the
utility supplying electricity to a building. In this case only consumption is
quantified (e.g. kWh) and rated, and not the environmental loading (e.g.
CO
2
) unless the mix of energy sources (gas, oil, electricity) is significant.
The rational is that in the case of an inefficient supply, demand side
management can make a significant contribution to reducing
environmental load.
Regionally Responsive Criteria
Assessment criteria need to be relevant to the building and interior types
and setting, and environmental, social and economic priorities.
Consequently, some of the performance criteria in BEAM Plus reflect
Hong Kong’s humid sub-tropical climate and dense urban living
environment.
Scientific Rigour
Whilst BEAM Plus endeavours to provide for a comprehensive and fair
assessment it recognises that assessment criteria, assessment methods
and allocation of points are not comprehensive.
BEAM Plus addresses items only where the associated environmental
impacts have been proven, and for which reasonably objective
performance criteria can be defined. Certain performance aspects
attributable to buildings and interior spaces and their use have yet to be
included, either because the environmental impacts are not well defined,
or because performance criteria have not been established. They may
be included in future updates, when information becomes available to
permit a reasonably objective assessment.
In the meantime, it is argued that the real value of BEAM Plus lies not in
scientific rigour but in the actual improvements to built quality and the
levels of awareness amongst stakeholders resulting from its increasingly