Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  13 / 188 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 13 / 188 Next Page
Page Background

BEAM P

LUS FOR

E

XISTING

B

UILDINGS

F

RAMEWORK

V

ERSION

1.2

Copyright © 2012 BEAM Society Limited. All rights reserved.

Page 6

For existing buildings, there are two facets to performance. Building and

system performance are a consequence of technical features of the

building and depend on the standards to which the building was built

and/or subsequently modified. The building end use and the

effectiveness of management practices in operating the building also

have significant influence on performance. In order to encourage

improvements, BEAM Plus for Existing Buildings, distinguishes between

the potential impacts of these two aspects of the performance of a

building.

E

STATES

When a building forms part of an estate then certain features of the

estate design will be included in the assessment. In an estate containing

several buildings of essentially similar design, assessment of Site

Aspects, Materials Aspects and Water Use for one building can apply to

all the buildings, although Energy Use and IEQ assessments will require

further evaluation if all the buildings are to be graded under BEAM.

S

PECIAL

C

ASES

It is possible that some buildings may not be fully embraced by the

criteria currently presented in BEAM Plus for Existing Buildings due to

their unusual nature or variety of forms and system designs, etc. This will

be particularly true in respect of assessment of energy use. In such

circumstances certain assessment criteria or the method of

demonstrating compliance may need to be modified. This would require

endorsement from BEAM Society Limited.

A

BSOLUTE VERSUS

R

ELATIVE

P

ERFORMANCE

Through an opinion survey of BEAM Society members [4], it is clear that

there should be a balance between assessment of ‘absolute’

performance, i.e. issues over which the Client may have little or no

control (e.g. car parking provisions), and ‘relative’ performance, i.e.

issues that can be influenced by the Client.

In addition, BEAM takes the position that assessment of some aspects of

building performance should not be penalised because of externalities

that are not under the control of the Client, such as the efficiency of the

utility supplying energy sources to a building. In this case, only

consumption is quantified (e.g. kWh) and rated, and not the consequent

environmental loadings (e.g. CO

2

-kg) unless the mix of energy sources

(gas, oil, electricity) is significant.

A

SSESSMENT

B

OUNDARIES

BEAM is concerned about the interactions between the assessed

building, neighbouring properties, and the neighbourhood in general. The

assessment seeks to reduce negative impacts on neighbours and

rewards efforts to improve the quality of the immediate surroundings to

the benefit of the neighbourhood: the concept of ‘good neighbour’

buildings.

A

SSESSABLE

A

REA

-

D

ISCRETE

A

REAS

E

XCLUDED

F

ROM

A

SSESSMENT

The BEAM Plus rating tool is structured to cope with different types of

buildings and allows certain discrete areas within the boundary of the

project, or development, to be excluded from the assessment. Areas

within the development or building, such as common areas, MVAC plant

rooms, transformer rooms, lifts and lift motor rooms, plant rooms for

environmentally friendly systems and features such as rainwater / grey

water recycling systems, battery rooms for solar panels or similar, club

house areas, swimming pools, car parks, garbage disposal and handling

areas, workshops, balconies or similar CANNOT be excluded from the

assessable area of the project.

4

BEAM Society. Report on the Development of HK-BEAM Scheme – Survey I Framework.