Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  14 / 248 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 14 / 248 Next Page
Page Background

BEAM P

LUS FOR

N

EW

B

UILDINGS

F

RAMEWORK

V

ERSION

1.2

Copyright © 2012 BEAM Society Limited. All rights reserved.

Page 7

R

EGIONALLY

R

ESPONSIVE

C

RITERIA

In Hong Kong’s humid sub-tropical climate and dense urban living

environment, people need to be provided with alternatives to enclosed,

air-conditioned spaces, so that the provisions for natural ventilation and

daylight figure prominently in the assessment of indoor environments.

P

ERFORMANCE

B

ENCHMARKS

The benchmark (zero credit level) for particular performance criteria is

established by reference to legal requirements which may be required as

a prerequisite. BEAM uses local performance standards, codes and

guides where these are available (e.g. indoor air quality). Where these

are not available (e.g. impact noise) international or national standards,

codes and guides are referenced. Where there are differences in the

performance criteria set by the various authorities, BEAM will generally

avoid specifying the performance criteria (e.g. thermal comfort), allowing

Clients to specify what they consider to be appropriate for their building.

A BEAM assessment seeks to establish that the specified levels of

performance are acceptable and have been achieved. Where

performance standards are not well defined (e.g. energy use), BEAM

establishes its own performance benchmarks based on available data

and stakeholder consensus. Credits are awarded for achieving higher

levels of performance. It is intended that the assessment criteria be

updated periodically as new information becomes available and as legal

requirements evolve.

F

LEXIBLE AND

O

BJECTIVE

BEAM embraces a wide range of buildings, variable in terms of scale,

location and mix of uses (types of premises). The assessment criteria

and methods of assessment need to be flexible and to allow for

alternative means of compliance, yet be reasonably objective to enable

the BEAM Assessor to arrive at decisions without undue controversy.

Where issues are rather subjective, i.e. performance criteria cannot be

quantified or determined through a compliance specification, BEAM uses

‘checklists’ to facilitate equitable and consistent assessments.

P

ERFORMANCE

C

ATEGORIES

Different assessment methods in use world-wide arrange performance

aspects under different headings to reflect the preferences of the tool

developer. In BEAM, the various performance aspects covered are

grouped within the following categories:

S

ITE

A

SPECTS

(S

A

)

Generally speaking site issues, as listed in BEAM, will not vary

significantly with the type of building. However, the scale and location of

the building will determine the extent to which environmental aspects

associated with the site are significant and can be addressed in the

assessment. Site Aspects include:

location and design of the building;

emissions from the site; and

site management.

M

ATERIALS

A

SPECTS

(M

A

)

Similar to site issues, materials use issues included in BEAM will be

similar for all types of buildings, although the size of the building will have

significance. Materials Aspects include:

selection of materials;

efficient use of materials; and

waste disposal and recycling.